McCain Defends His Housing Plan
Elizabeth Holmes reports from Lubbock, Texas on the presidential race.
Sen. John McCain disputed charges of flip-flopping on his plan to address the housing crisis Friday, saying that his Thursday speech promoting increased government intervention was consistent with his past remarks. “It’s just factually incorrect,” he said, to suggest otherwise.
In speaking to the press for the first time in nearly a week, the expected Republican nominee was supplied with several pages of prepared remarks on his plans for the economy.
He disputed suggestions that his plan resembles legislation sponsored by Democrats Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Rep. Barney Frank of Massachusetts.

Both the Dodd-Frank proposal and the McCain plan would be open to homeowners who owe more on their homes than they are worth. Both would require lenders to write off part of the principal and, in exchange, the new loan would be backed by the federal government through the Federal Housing Administration. The Democratic plan is more expensive, though, and aims to help more homeowners.
McCain said his plan is aimed at the homeowner, not the lender—and hammered home the scope of his plan. “There are hundreds of thousands of homeowners who could benefit from this plan immediately,” he said. He did not mention, however, that the plan is estimated to cost between $3 and $10 billion.
The Wall Street Journal reported today on McCain’s call for a more aggressive government role in addressing the housing crisis just two weeks after he initially suggested a more hands-off approach was appropriate.
McCain stiffened when asked whether his plan amounted to a government bailout. “I said that there shouldn’t be a broad government bailout. I said very clearly and I’d be glad to get the record of what I said,” he said.
He then paused briefly and read from his notes again: “I said that the government has to enact reforms to prevent this kind of crisis from happening and there was a role for the government, and I supported bipartisan solutions that would pass quickly.”
This dude flip-flops more than John Kery.
I guess McCain finally got tired of getting beaten up on a daily basis by the pro-handout Dems. This is sad coming from a guy who survived 5 1/2 years of torture as a POW.
‘would require lenders to write off part of the principal’
As Barney Frank made clear earlier in the week this is false. All write off’s would be voluntary. They have to be as the homeowner and lender are already in a contractual relationship. For any of these schemes to move forward the lenders have to co-operate. I think the whole thing will come to nothing. The lenders themselves could do this - why is government getting involved? To look like they are doing something.
“All write off’s would be voluntary. They have to be as the homeowner and lender are already in a contractual relationship.”
–
Couldn’t have said it better. It’s also worth noting that any legislation affecting these contracts may very well be considered ex post facto, and therefore, not constitutional. Just like you said, it will all amount to nothing. Government is trying to force a solution when it was the origin of the problem to begin with.
How’s your memory? I hope it isn’t too good like most americans who have a two minute attention span. It could be just like old times again drinking Bilderberg wine and Cindi Beer. John is one of us be nice to him!
Just another sign of the same old corrupt players in the financial matrix of globalisation back at work to misdirect you once again. Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on –!
Vintage 1970′ & 1980’s, sound familiar, and the conspiracy people are nuts right, like Perot on Nafta? Sure we are, just another financial machination, nothing to get excited about.
Some regulators noted the danger and pushed for more oversight, but Congress refused. Some of this may be due to the Keating Five, five Senators (Dennis DeConcini, Alan Cranston, John Glenn, Don Riegle and John McCain) who had received some $300,000 from Keating in the 1980s as political contributions. They later met twice with regulators who were investigating American Continental Corp., in an attempt to end the investigation. (In 1990, they would be rebuked to various degrees by the Senate Ethics Committee.)
In 1985, Keating hired Alan Greenspan as an economic consultant, in an effort to convince an oversight agency to exempt Lincoln Savings from certain regulations. Greenspan delivered a favorable report, writing that Lincoln Savings was “a financially strong institution that presents no foreseeable risk to depositors or the government.” (Greenspan produced similar favorable reports on numerous other banks that also failed soon after.) The agency ultimately declined the request.
American Continental Corporation, the parent of Lincoln Savings, went bankrupt in 1989. More than 21,000 mostly elderly investors lost their life savings, in total about $285 million. This occurred largely because they held securities backed by the parent company rather than deposits in the federally-insured institution, a distinction apparently lost on many if not most depositors until it was too late. The federal government covered almost $3 billion of Lincoln’s losses when it seized the institution. Many creditors were made whole, and the government then attempted to liquidate the seized assets through its Resolution Trust Corporation, often at pennies on the dollar compared to what the property had allegedly been worth and the valuation at which loans against it had been made.
In 1989, Keating, when subpoenaed to testify before the House Banking Committee, invoked his right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.[1][2]
He explodes at accusations of flip-flopping, then fails to give any valid reason backing up his defense. Facts: He had been a hands-off zealot in tackling the housing crisis and the economy. Mainstream/moderate criticism piled up, so he changed his tune and caved. That’s sketchy.
He has my whole-hearted support.Large sexy.I love him very much.I saw him many times in millonaire dating site”W e a l t h y L o v i n g . c o m”.I am wondering whether he searching his new love in this site?If I can catch a chance have a chatting with him?
McCain doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Makes you nostalgic for a wonk like Bill Clinton, who had a mind for ideas and could really expound on them; I never recall retractions, or “meant to say”s, etc, with him. He knew his stuff. The only thing McCain can talk about without notes is Iraq - and he’s still wrong!
fix the blog, only allow subscribers to post
Har Har Har Har Har Har! (Maybe if I keep laughing long enough, time will run out and I won’t have to answer any question. George is right; questions are tough.)
Har Har Har Har Har Har Har!
McCain to borrowers: Stop paying your mortgage!

Washington Wire is one of the oldest standing features in American journalism. Since the Wire